Token profile
Avalanche (AVAX)
Avalanche is seeded into the research universe, but current token-level evidence still requires collection or provider refresh.
Overview
Avalanche · Avalanche · Layer 1 blockchains. Websites and governance links are included for direct source review.
| Metric | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Seed status | Included in first-pass universeneutral | Seed configuration Open sourceexample-seed Confidence: high Seed entry only. No current market value is asserted. |
| Current price | Not collectedmissing | Research queue Open sourcenot-collected Confidence: low Requires collection, verification, or a paid provider. |
| Market capitalization | Not collectedmissing | Research queue Open sourcenot-collected Confidence: low Requires collection, verification, or a paid provider. |
Overall score
2.3
/ 100
Needs deeper validation
Confidence
94%
Missing-data penalty
-0.0
Data-age penalty
-6.0
Penalties
1
Revenue and revenue growth
Rewards durable fee generation, growth, and quality while discounting incentive-dependent revenue.
0.0 / 15
Token-holder value capture
Measures whether protocol success translates into token demand, buybacks, burns, or revenue sharing.
0.0 / 15
Net buyback yield
Separates gross buyback narratives from net sellable supply after emissions, unlocks, and incentives.
8.3 / 15
User and volume growth
Rewards adoption, transaction activity, and share gains rather than isolated token marketing.
0.0 / 10
Utility
Measures whether the token is genuinely required for access, collateral, governance, or economic participation.
0.0 / 10
Supply quality
Rewards healthier float and lockups while penalizing aggressive unlocks and concentration.
5.0 / 10
Relative valuation
Compares valuation against peers on revenue, fees, TVL, and user monetization.
0.0 / 10
Liquidity and exitability
A high score requires enough volume and depth to enter or exit size without severe slippage.
5.0 / 10
Competitive moat
Captures network effects, switching costs, distribution, and structural advantages.
0.0 / 5
Applied penalties
- Weak liquidity: -10 points. Exitability is poor relative to the minimum position-size requirement.
Four-quadrant tokenomics
Utility, locking, buybacks, and burns all require evidence, not just charts.
Utility: 0.0 / 10
Not enough evidence yet.
Requires research.
Locking and loyalty: 0.0 / 10
Not enough evidence yet.
Requires research.
Buybacks: 0.0 / 10
Not enough evidence yet.
Requires research.
Burns and scarcity: 0.0 / 10
Not enough evidence yet.
Requires research.
Net token flow
Gross demand and sellable supply remain separated across low, base, and high cases.
| Scenario | Gross buying pressure | New sellable supply | Net token flow | Net buyback yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| low | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | 0.00% |
| base | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | 0.00% |
| high | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | 0.00% |
Protocol fundamentals
Measures whether the underlying protocol is succeeding.
| Metric | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Protocol fundamentals | Not collectedmissing | Research queue Open sourcenot-collected Confidence: low Requires collection, verification, or a paid provider. |
Token fundamentals
Measures whether protocol success benefits the token itself.
| Metric | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Token-holder value capture | Not collectedmissing | Research queue Open sourcenot-collected Confidence: low Requires collection, verification, or a paid provider. |
Supply analysis
Float, unlocks, concentration, and future sell pressure matter directly to token quality.
| Metric | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Supply analysis | Not collectedmissing | Research queue Open sourcenot-collected Confidence: low Requires collection, verification, or a paid provider. |
Value capture, liquidity, and valuation
Direct cash-flow alignment is weighed against exitability and price paid.
| Metric | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Value capture | Not collectedmissing | Research queue Open sourcenot-collected Confidence: low Requires collection, verification, or a paid provider. |
| Metric | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Liquidity and exitability | Not collectedmissing | Research queue Open sourcenot-collected Confidence: low Requires collection, verification, or a paid provider. |
| Metric | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Relative valuation | Not collectedmissing | Research queue Open sourcenot-collected Confidence: low Requires collection, verification, or a paid provider. |
Score history
Historical scores help show whether the thesis is strengthening or weakening.
Revenue versus price
Price and protocol usage should be inspected together.
Buybacks versus emissions
Gross positives can be cancelled by larger supply expansion.
Catalysts
Potential demand or thesis-improvement events.
| Catalyst | Date | Tone | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research required | 2026-07-26 | caution | Current quantitative evidence has not been loaded yet. |
Risks
High-conviction research includes explicit invalidation and structural risk handling.
| Risk | Severity | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Missing data | high | The platform penalizes this asset until fundamentals and tokenomics are collected. |
Claims and evidence
Claims remain separate from verified data until independently confirmed.
No special seeded claims for this token yet.